miranda case Essays

miranda case Essays miranda case Essay miranda case Essay Westlaw Delivery Summary Report for 1,IPDate/Time of Request:Client Identifier:Database:Citation Text:Lines:Documents:Images:Sunday, May 13, 2012 10:33 CentralCHINACUSCTFIND86 S.Ct. 1602450010The material accompanying this summary is subject to copyright. Usage is governed by contract with Thomson Reuters,West and their affiliates.86 S.Ct. 1602FOR EDUCATIONAL USE ONLYPage 1384 U.S. 436, 10 Ohio Misc. 9, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 10 A.L.R.3d 974, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 36 O.O.2d 237, 39 O.O.2d 63(Cite as: 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602)tained in violation of Fifth Amendment privilegeagainst self-incrimination.Supreme Court of the United StatesErnesto A. MIRANDA, Petitioner,v.STATE OF ARIZONA.Michael VIGNERA, Petitioner,v.STATE OF NEW YORK.Carl Calvin WESTOVER, Petitioner,v.UNITED STATES.STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Petitioner,v.Roy Allen STEWART.Nos. 759- 761, 584.Argued Feb. 28, March 1 and 2, 1966.Decided June 13, 1966.Rehearing Denied No. 584 Oct. 10, 1966.See 87 S.Ct. 11.Criminal pros ecutions. The Superior Court,Maricopa County, Arizona, rendered judgment,and the Supreme Court of Arizona, 98 Ariz. 18,401 P.2d 721, affirmed. The Supreme Court,Kings County, New York, rendered judgment,and the Supreme Court, Appellate Division,Second Department, 21 A.D.2d 752, 252N.Y.S.2d 19, affirmed, as did the Court of Appeals of the State of New York at 15 N.Y.2d 970,259 N.Y.S.2d 857, 207 N.E.2d 527. The UnitedStates District Court for the Northern District ofCalifornia, Northern Division, rendered judgment, and the United States Court of Appeals forthe Ninth Circuit, 342 F.2d 684, affirmed. TheSuperior Court, Los Angeles County, California,rendered judgment and the Supreme Court ofCalifornia, 62 Cal.2d 571, 43 Cal.Rptr. 201, 400P.2d 97, reversed. In the first three cases, defendants obtained certiorari, and the State of California obtained certiorari in the fourth case. The Supreme